Pay Transparency 2.0: Are You Ready for 2026?

A hiring manager once forwarded me a job posting but had not added a proposed salary range. When I pushed back to discuss the range further, she asked the right question: “Why do we suddenly need to include a salary range and a benefits summary?” She just wanted to post for an urgent backfill quickly and have that discussion later.

The role had not changed. The business had not changed. What had changed, quietly, was the law.

Pay transparency requirements had expanded into a state where she was looking to hire. Overnight, a routine posting became a compliance risk. And like many organizations, we were underprepared and simply trying to catch up.

That moment captures where many HR teams will find themselves heading into 2026: aware that pay transparency is “a thing,” but unready for the scope, enforcement, and structural impact it now carries. Pay transparency has evolved into a compliance mandate with real consequences. In 2026, the gap between compliance and readiness will widen.

Over the past several years, states have steadily passed pay transparency laws requiring employers to disclose salary or wage ranges in job postings or upon request. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), pay transparency provisions now appear in laws across multiple states, with requirements varying by jurisdiction. A quick overview of 2026 pay transparency laws by state can be found here.

States such as Colorado, California, and New York already require salary ranges in job postings, with additional disclosure and recordkeeping obligations. Other states have expanded enforcement or are actively considering similar legislation, and HR organizations like SHRM continue to flag pay transparency as a rapidly evolving compliance area.

What has changed heading into 2026 is not just the number of laws. It is how they are being enforced and how broadly they apply.

Enforcement Is Replacing Education

Early pay transparency laws focused on awareness and voluntary compliance. That era is ending.

States like Colorado (EPEWA) and Washington (EPOA) authorize civil penalties and have enforced requirements for noncompliant postings. California expanded enforcement resources following Senate Bill 1162, which also introduced annual pay data reporting requirements for larger employers (CPDP). New York’s Department of Labor has issued employer guidance clarifying that ranges must be included in good faith and reflect realistic compensation (NYDOL).

By 2026, pay transparency will no longer be enforced quietly. HR teams should expect increased scrutiny, employee complaints, and regulator follow-up, especially where inconsistencies or omissions appear systematic.

One of the most common compliance failures is not intentional. It is geographic.

Many pay transparency laws apply based on where a job could be performed, not just where a company is headquartered. If you employ remote workers across multiple states, all job postings may need to comply with the strictest applicable jurisdiction.

This creates real risk for organizations that:

• Post roles as “remote” without specifying location
• Lack a clear inventory of employee work locations
• Rely on recruiters or hiring managers to manage postings without centralized review

In practice, pay transparency has become a multi-state compliance exercise, not a recruiting preference.

Pay Transparency Exposes Weak Infrastructure

Here is the uncomfortable truth. You cannot comply with pay transparency laws if your compensation architecture is messy.

Many organizations are discovering that:

• Job titles are inconsistent across departments
• Salary bands are outdated or poorly defined
• Employees sit outside stated ranges due to past exceptions
• Managers negotiated pay without guardrails
• Compensation philosophy was never clearly articulated

Transparency does not create pay problems. It reveals them. When employees see ranges publicly posted, internal questions follow quickly:

• “Why is my role posted at a higher range than my current pay?”
• “What determines placement within the band?”
• “How do I move through the range?”

Without structure, HR is left reacting instead of leading.

The 2026 Transparency Trap

Many organizations still treat pay transparency as a compliance task for Talent Acquisition. In reality, it is an organizational systems requirement that touches compensation, job architecture, manager capability, and employee trust.

Posting a range is easy. Standing behind it is not.

This is where HR must shift from compliance executor to architect.

The Solution: What HR Must Do Heading Into 2026

Pay transparency readiness is achievable, but only with intentional work. Here is where HR should focus now.

Start with the foundation. HR should be able to answer:

• Do we have consistent job titles and levels across the organization?
• Are pay ranges tied to credible market data?
• Are employees paid within their assigned ranges?
• Where do exceptions exist, and why?

This audit is not about perfection. It is about visibility. You cannot defend what you cannot explain.

For every state where employees are located, document:

• Whether salary ranges must appear in job postings
• Whether internal disclosure is required upon request
• Whether record retention or reporting is mandated
• What penalties apply

This matrix becomes a shared tool for HR, recruiters, and legal partners, and minimizes well-intended mistakes.

To reduce risk, organizations should move toward a single, compliant posting format that includes:

• Salary range
• Bonus or incentive eligibility
• Benefits summary where required
• Geographic pay differential language
• Any required legal disclosures

Consistency is your strongest defense.

Most compliance failures occur in conversation, not documentation. Recruiters and managers need guidance on:

• How to discuss pay ranges accurately
• What they can and cannot promise
• How to explain midpoint, progression, and pay philosophy
• How to handle internal employee questions

Pay transparency without manager readiness creates confusion and erodes trust.

Once ranges are public, employees will compare. That is human. HR should proactively prepare:

• FAQs explaining how ranges are set
• Guidance on how performance, tenure, and skills affect placement within the range
• A consistent narrative about pay philosophy
• A clear escalation path for pay concerns

Transparency paired with silence is destabilizing. Transparency paired with clarity builds credibility.

Pay transparency is not just about compliance. It is about confidence in systems, leadership, and fairness.

When HR builds clear job architecture, defensible pay ranges, and consistent communication, transparency becomes a stabilizing force rather than a risk. The organizations that will navigate 2026 successfully are not those posting ranges the fastest, but those that can explain them the best.

Pay transparency is not about what you disclose. It is about what your systems can support.

As enforcement expands and expectations rise, HR’s role is to ensure transparency is accurate, equitable, and sustainable. The work done now will determine whether transparency becomes a liability or a foundation of trust.

—

Stephanie Latarewicz SHRM-SCP, SPHR, GBA and founder of Reel HR, LLC brings over a decade of real-world HR leadership experience to the world of talent acquisition and workforce development.

The information contained in this site is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.